Think about something that interests, surprises, or confuses you, and consider whether it is something you can reasonably investigate for a project. Formulate a single question that sums up you would like to examine. [1] X Trustworthy Source Science Buddies Expert-sourced database of science projects, explanations, and educational material Go to source For instance, say you’ve heard that you can make a simple solar oven out of a pizza box. [2] X Research source You may, however, be skeptical as to whether this can be done, or done consistently at least. Therefore, your question might be: “Can a simple solar oven be made that works consistently in various conditions?” Make sure the topic you select is manageable within your time frame, budget, and skill level, and that it doesn’t break any rules for the assignment/fair/competition (for example, no animal testing). You can search for ideas online if you need help, but don’t just copy a project you find there; this will also be against the rules and is unethical. However, you can modify an existing project to test a different hypothesis or look into a question that was not answered by previous experiments. This isn’t an ethical breach, and can often make for interesting results and discussions.
Be aware of the requirements for your project. Many science fairs require that you have at least three reputable academic sources such as peer-reviewed journal publications to use as references. [4] X Trustworthy Source Science Buddies Expert-sourced database of science projects, explanations, and educational material Go to source Your sources will need to be unbiased (not tied to a product for sale, for instance), timely (not an encyclopedia from 1965), and credible (not some anonymous comment on a blog post). Web sources that are supported by a scientific organization or journal are a good bet. Ask your teacher or project director for guidance if you need it. For instance, the search query “how to make a solar oven out of a pizza box” will produce a bounty of sources, some more scientifically-grounded (and thus reliable) than others. The hit on an on-topic article in a recognized, reputable periodical should be considered a valid source. [5] X Research source On the other hand, blog posts, anonymous articles, and crowd-sourced materials probably won’t make the cut. As valuable a resource as wikiHow is, it may not be considered a valid source for your SIP. It can, however, be helpful in introducing you to your chosen experiment and pointing you toward more academic sources. Choosing well-developed articles with numerous footnotes (that link to solid sources themselves) will improve the odds of acceptance, but discuss the issue with your instructor, fair organizer, etc.
It is often helpful to turn your question into a hypothesis by thinking in “if / then” terms. You may want to frame your hypothesis (at least initially) as “If [I do this], then [this will happen]. " For our example, the hypothesis might be: “A solar oven made from a pizza box can consistently heat foods any time there is abundant sunshine. "
Consideration of variables is key in setting up your experiment. Scientific experiments have three types of variables: independent (those changed by you); dependent (those that change in response to the independent variable); and controlled (those that remain the same). [8] X Trustworthy Source Science Buddies Expert-sourced database of science projects, explanations, and educational material Go to source When planning your experiment, consider the materials that you will need. Make sure they are readily available and affordable, or even better, use materials that are already in your house. For our pizza box solar oven, the materials are easy to acquire and assemble. The oven, item cooked (s’mores, for instance), and full sunshine will be controlled variables. Other environmental conditions (time or day or time of year, for instance) could be the independent variable; and “done-ness” of the item the dependent variable.
Closely follow the steps that you have planned to test your experiment. However, if your test can not be conducted as planned, reconfigure your steps or try different materials. (If you really want to win the science fair, this will be a big step for you!) It is common practice for science fairs that you will need to conduct your test at least three times to ensure a scientifically-valid result. [10] X Trustworthy Source Science Buddies Expert-sourced database of science projects, explanations, and educational material Go to source For our pizza box oven, then, let’s say you decide to test your solar oven by placing it in direct sun on three similar, 90-degree Fahrenheit days in July, at three times each day (10 am, 2 pm, 6 pm).
Sometimes your data may be best recorded as a graph, chart, or just a journal entry. However you record the data, make sure it is easy to review and analyze. Keep accurate records of all your results, even if they don’t turn out the way you hoped or planned. This is also part of science![11] X Research source As per the solar oven tests at 10 am, 2 pm, and 6 pm on three sunny days, you will need to utilize your results. By recording the done-ness of your s’mores (by how melted the chocolate and marshmallow is, for instance), you may find that only the 2 pm placement was consistently successful. [12] X Research source
If you started out with a simple, clear, straightforward question, and a similar hypothesis, it should be easier to craft your conclusion. Remember, concluding that your hypothesis was completely wrong does not make your SIP a failure. If you make clear, scientifically-grounded findings, and present them well, it can and will be a success. In the pizza box solar oven example, our hypothesis was “A solar oven made from a pizza box can consistently heat foods any time there is abundant sunshine. " Our conclusion, however, might be: “A solar oven made from a pizza box can only be consistently successful in heating foods in mid-day sun on a hot day. "
For a science fair, for example, the judging could be based on the following criteria (adding up to 100%): research paper (50%); oral presentation (30%); display poster (20%).
SIP abstracts are often limited to one page in length, and perhaps 250 words. In this short space, focus on the purpose of your experiment, procedures, results, and any possible applications. [14] X Research source
Use the guidelines provide by your teacher or the science fair director for information on how to construct your research paper. As one example, your paper may need to be broken down into categories such as: 1) Title Page; 2) Introduction (where you identify your topic and hypothesis); 3) Materials & Methods (where you describe your experiment); 4) Results & Discoveries (where you identify your findings); 5) Conclusion & Recommendations (where you “answer” your hypothesis); 6) References (where you list your sources).
Write up your research paper first, and use it as your guide in constructing your oral presentation. Follow a similar framework in outlining your hypothesis, experiments, results, and conclusions. Focus on clarity and concision. Make sure everyone understands what you did, why you did it, and what you discovered in doing it.
Science fairs commonly use a standard size, three panel display board, approximately 36 inches high by 48 inches wide. You should lay out your poster like the front page of a newspaper, with your title at the top, hypothesis and conclusion front and center, and supporting materials (methods, sources, etc. ) clearly placed under headings on either side. Use images, diagrams, and the like to spruce up the visual appeal of your poster, but don’t sacrifice content for visual pizzazz.
